All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

The gist of the grounds for appeal by the defendant is that the punishment of the court below (two years and four months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, and the gist of the prosecutor's appeal is that the court below's punishment is too uneasible and unfair.

The fact that the defendant is against the defendant, that the defendant is against the defendant, and that the defendant has no criminal power is favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, the crime of Bosing, like the instant case, is planned and organized for many and unspecified persons, thereby causing serious damage to the victims as well as severe social harm as well as severe punishment. The Defendant is responsible for the role of telephone counselors in the instant crime, and the degree of participation in the instant crime cannot be deemed to be negligible, and the period of participation in the instant crime is relatively long. The Defendant was involved in the Bosing crime even before the instant case, and the Defendant was not properly recovered from damage.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, career, character and conduct, motive of the instant crime, circumstances after the instant crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court is deemed appropriate, and it does not seem that it is too heavy or too unreasonable because it is too unreasonable. Therefore, each of the Defendant and the prosecutor’s arguments on unreasonable sentencing are without merit.

Therefore, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.