logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 김포시법원 2018.09.19 2017가단1060
청구이의
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

In the case of this court's claim for the purchase price of goods against the plaintiff 2014 Ghana28389, the fact that the judgment ordering the plaintiff to pay to the defendant 10 million won and 20% interest per annum from April 29, 2015 to the day of full payment is significant in this court.

The plaintiff asserts that the above judgment is the remainder payment obligation of the defendant's household installation works, which is defective in the part of the construction executed by the defendant, and that the defect repair claims of KRW 19,370,000 shall be offset on July 23, 2014 by the automatic bond, the above judgment was all extinguished and the remaining money is claimed to be paid.

However, even according to the Plaintiff’s assertion, it is clear that the time when the damage was incurred due to the defect in the above construction and the time when the Plaintiff asserts that the damage was confirmed due to the defect caused by the defect caused by the defect in the construction work, and the time when the damage was confirmed due to the defect repair claim by the claim for the construction work, is the time prior to July 23, 2014, which is the set-off declaration date. At the time, there was no evidence that the Plaintiff raised an objection or problem against the Defendant even though the said final judgment case was not filed (the lawsuit was filed on December 30, 2014), there was a defect, as alleged by the Plaintiff, in that the Plaintiff claims damages for the defect exceeding

The plaintiff's claim is without merit because the evidence Nos. 4 and 5, which seems to be consistent with the plaintiff's claim amount or that the damage is the same as the plaintiff's claim amount.

arrow