The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the court below's imprisonment (three years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable;

2. The crime of this case is that the defendant acquired the lost credit card and cellular lock, embezzled without returning it, used the credit card so acquired at a restaurant, stolen goods, stolen goods, stolen goods, and attempted to steal goods by destroying the bank on the outdoor table table, and used violence for the purpose of evading the arrest of the victim of the larceny who was driving away from this, and, apart, did not submit information on the change of personal information to the head of a competent police office, even though he was subject to the registration of personal information.

It is recognized that the Defendant fully recognized the crime of this case, and that the amount of property damage caused by the crime of this case is relatively small, and that the Defendant appears to have committed the crime of this case due to economic lack.

However, each of the crimes in the case of 2020 Gohap127 committed only one day at the time when three months have not passed since the defendant was released from prison.

In the past, the defendant has been sentenced to a fine or imprisonment with prison labor on several occasions due to crimes such as injury, theft, intrusion of residence, assault, fraud, etc., and has committed the same kind of crime without being aware of even though he is in the period of repeated crime.

In the case of attempted robbery, the victim N's face, which has been driven by the crime of attempted robbery, has been displayed several times, and the victim has expressed a desire and threat. This seems to have been a considerable fear and mental impulse.

In the case of larceny crimes, there is a relatively high risk in that it intrudes into abandoned houses and commits crimes.

There is no recovery of damage, and in the case of a crime not submitted personal information, the nature and circumstances of the crime such as re-offending despite the record of being sentenced to a fine for the same kind of crime are considerably insufficient, so it is inevitable to punish the crime corresponding to the responsibility for the crime.