A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that it does not interfere with the defendant's right of defense, part of the facts charged was adopted and investigated by this court.

The Defendant is the former husband of F, who is the victim E, and is the president of G, H, I and J Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “stock company”) who is a de facto single shareholder interest.

Around January 5, 2013, the Defendant filed a complaint with K, the representative director of G, in collusion with M, operating L Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “L”) and embezzled money to M in the manner of remitting money each 10 million won or 20 million won each month, in collusion with L Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “L”) for the purpose of business, at the Dong-gu Seoul Metropolitan District Public Prosecutor’s Office’s Office of Public Prosecutor’s Office, stating that “E, as the representative director of G or H, embezzled money for the purpose of cleaning.”

However, the above G from around 197 to Qa Co., Ltd. in charge of the management of the building (P building) used by the N in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, concluded a cleaning service contract with Qa Co., Ltd. in order to take full charge of the management of the building as a result of the cleaning service contract, and the M, which newly established L, entered into a cleaning service contract with L on February 2002. Since then, the R, the representative of G, was the victim of G, who was the service manager of G, proposed the above proposal to M, but it is recognized that R, as the victim of M and R, made the above proposal to M, and thereafter reported it to E and obtained approval from the Defendant.

A. Around February 2003, G around February 2, 2002, the name at the time of concluding a cleaning service contract with L was G was G. Around February 12, 2003, when concluding a contract again on February 12, 2003, the expiration of the contract term, it would have concluded a contract under H’s name (around that time, it appears that the cleaning service fee was increased out of the building management price paid to L) and paid part of the cleaning service price to M.