(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.02.27 2014고단3445

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.02.27 2014고단3445

교통사고처리특례법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing taxi.

On September 23, 2014, the Defendant driven the above taxi on September 23, 2014, and transferred to the Hyundai Arts Center approximately 10km in speed from the 10km back to the front and rear door of the Ulsan-dong, Ulsan-dong, Ulsan-dong, Ulsan-dong, Seoul-dong, Ulsan-dong, and then bypassing the road of the modern department store by about 899.

Since there are crosswalks where signal lights are not installed on the front side, in such a case, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving service is a person who renders a way to reduce speed and to see well the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the duty of care to drive safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and proceeded along as is, by negligence, received the part of the victim C (the 77-year-old) left side of the crosswalk from the right side of the Defendant’s taxi running ahead of the cab.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim out of the upper half of the upper half of the 10 week back to the upper half of the 10 weeks of medical treatment due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Photographs related to traffic accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is not less than that of the victim, there is no same criminal record, the victim does not want the punishment against the defendant by mutual consent with the victim, and other conditions of sentencing, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the defendant shall be selected to impose a fine on the defendants and the punishment as ordered.

참조조문

유사 판례

-울산지방법원 2015.04.30 2015고단286

-울산지방법원 2016.10.27 2016고단1636

-울산지방법원 2016.11.22 2016고단2393

-서울남부지방법원 2014.02.12 2014고정4

-울산지방법원 2015.01.16 2014고단3384