logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2016.06.15 2015가단26770
물품대금
Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 8,376,350 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its related amount from March 14, 2015 to June 15, 2016.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a corporation with the objective of seeds, seeds, and seedlings production and sales business, and the Defendant is engaged in the business of cultivating and selling flowers, such as paintings, in the trade name of “B.”

B. From 2007, the Plaintiff supplied the Defendant with the conspiracy of nationalization, etc., and the Defendant continued to engage in transactions by way of payment after confirming the quantity, etc. of the mother species supplied by the Plaintiff according to the head of the sales office prepared by the Plaintiff.

C. On June 21, 2013, the Plaintiff supplied the Defendant with KRW 20,000, totaling KRW 5,000, which was supplied by the head of the budget nationalization test of the Korea Agricultural Technology Institute, Chungcheongnam-do, to the Defendant for KRW 250,000.

Although the Defendant cultivated the aforesaid gold spawn, it did not sell most of the said gold spawn, and requested the Plaintiff to resolve the problem. On November 1, 2013, the Plaintiff agreed with the Defendant to deduct KRW 2,500,000, which corresponds to 10,000 out of the said single spawn, and to supply KRW 2,00 free of charge during the year 2014, but the Defendant paid KRW 4,658,350, out of the amount unpaid until November 15, 2013.

Accordingly, on November 1, 2013, the Plaintiff deducted the said KRW 2,500,000 from the president of the Korea Development Bank.

On January 27, 2014, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to sign a written confirmation of the transaction balance that the amount to be attempted falls under KRW 15,005,350, and the Defendant signed the written confirmation of the transaction balance and signed the written repayment plan stating that the amount will be paid in installments.

E. On January 9, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into an order with the Defendant to supply 660 won per unit, 1,50 of the Hague type 1,50, 500 Gadroids of New Instruments, 500 Gadroids of New Instruments, 500 Gadroids of New Instruments, and elra or Gadroids of 50 won per unit.

The upper part of the above order contract states "URC Supply, 2,000 free supply."

Accordingly, on April 3, 2014, the Plaintiff 500 Gadroids for the Defendant.

arrow