logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.09.16 2015고단3263
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of Category B of Launa car.

On May 30, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 00:45, and proceeded straight ahead of the D cafeteria located in Osan City at the speed of about 40 km per hour among the two lanes of the substitute, from the total angle of fisheries located in the same area as that of the substitute.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive by accurately operating the steering and steering system.

Nevertheless, while neglecting this, the Defendant erroneously fabricated the hand hand on the right while driving, and caused the rocketing vehicle of the Defendant’s driving to go more than two lanes from the first lane to the second two-lanes, and led to a shock between the driver’s seat in Fpote vehicle owned by E, which is parked inside the parking zone on the right side of the two-lane side of the running direction, which is parked in the inside of the parking zone on the right side of the driving direction.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the course of performing the above duties, destroyed the 140,338 won of the repair cost to the left-hand side of the said Poste test vehicle, but failed to immediately stop the vehicle and take necessary measures, and escaped without taking necessary measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the occurrence of E traffic accident;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A traffic accident occurrence report;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant statutory provisions concerning criminal facts and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (Selection of fines in consideration of the fact that punishment is recognized for criminal conduct, the degree of damage is not serious, and the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment, etc.);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow