1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B’s building listed in the separate sheet No. 6;

B. Defendant C shall set forth in [Attachment] List 8.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a housing redevelopment and rearrangement project association whose project implementation district is Seoul Songpa-gu, E, Japan 98,690 square meters and whose project implementation district is a project implementation district on April 27, 2015, which was approved by the head of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government pursuant to Article 49(2) of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents on April 27, 2015, and notified the management and disposal plan

B. Defendant B, as a lessee of the building listed in paragraph (6) of the attached Table No. 6 of the real estate list, occupies the above building, and Defendant C, as the owner of the building listed in paragraph (8) of the attached Table No. 8 of the real estate list, occupies the above building at present. The part occupied by

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the Defendants are obligated to suspend the use of and profits from the real estate located in the project implementation district pursuant to Article 49(6) and (3) of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents, and to deliver each real estate in possession to the Plaintiff,

B. As to the assertion by Defendant C, pursuant to Article 44(5) and (4) of the articles of association of the Plaintiff Union, and Article 23 of the Construction Contract Agreement, Defendant C wishes to withdraw the intention of application for parcelling-out and become a person subject to cash settlement if the procedures for concluding a contract for parcelling-out are conducted within 60 days after the notification of the approval plan for the management and disposal of the head of Songpa-gu Office for the instant project zone pursuant to Article 23 of the Enforcement Decree of the Construction Contract. Since the Plaintiff did not proceed with the procedures for concluding a contract for parcelling-out within the limit of 60 days after the approval plan for the management and disposal plan, Defendant C

The term "person who has withdrawn an application for parcelling-out" subject to cash settlement pursuant to Article 47 (1) of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents shall apply for parcelling-out within the period of application for parcelling-out, but