The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In light of the various sentencing conditions of the instant case on unreasonable sentencing, the sentence imposed by the lower court (three years of imprisonment, four years of suspension of execution, two hundred hours of community service order, and forty hours of attending a sexual assault treatment lecture) is too uneasible and unreasonable.

(b) It is unreasonable that the defendant's personal information is not disclosed or notified, even though the defendant's improper exemption from disclosure or notification is likely to repeat an offense.

2. Determination

A. Examining the various sentencing conditions in the instant case on the assertion of unfair sentencing, the instant crime was committed by the Defendant by intrusion into the dormitory room where only female students of the same school reside, and the nature of the crime is not less than that of the victim, and one of the victims is a juvenile, and immediately after the Defendant committed each crime against the victim G and H, the said victims committed an additional crime against the victim I even if they escaped from the lock site and committed the crime against the victim I.

However, in full view of the following facts: (a) the Defendant was a primary offender with no criminal history; (b) the Defendant’s age at the time of committing the instant crime is relatively 18 years old; (c) the Defendant’s exercise of force in indecent act by compulsion is considerably weak and the degree of indecent act is not much serious; (d) the Defendant is divided into depth and reflects the Defendant’s mistake; (e) the Defendant’s victim H was the juvenile victim H at the lower court, the Defendant agreed with the victim G at the trial; and (e) other various sentencing conditions indicated in the instant argument, such as the Defendant’s character, conduct, environment, and family relationship, the sentence imposed by the lower court against the Defendant is deemed unreasonable.

Therefore, this part of the prosecutor's argument is without merit.

B. The following circumstances, i.e., the Defendant’s prior to the instant case as a student of the age of 19, by comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court and the lower court as to the wrongful argument regarding exemption from disclosure and notification order.