The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant did not commit a misunderstanding of facts against the victim D at the time of the instant case.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous and adversely affected by the judgment.

B. The judgment of the court below on the imposition of an unreasonable sentencing (700,000 won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court’s judgment and the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court as to the assertion of mistake of facts, the fact that the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the lower judgment

The defendant's above assertion is without merit.

1) The victim consistently stated from the investigative agency to the lower court that “The Defendant, while having been in a dispute with the victim at the time of the instant case, was faced with the Defendant’s boomed with the Defendant’s boomed with the Defendant’s hand, etc. and boomed with the left arms.” 2) The victim’s bodily injury diagnosis is consistent with the victim’s statement even though the victim’s bodily injury diagnosis that the Defendant’s bodily part (Evidence Nos. 13 through 15 of the evidence record) and the left part (the left part) showing a hole in the Defendant’s bodily part and left part) are necessary for two weeks’ medical treatment.

3. At the time of this case, the witness E at the trial of the political party stated that the defendant did not have a boomed situation to the victim, and agrees with the defendant's assertion.

(1) However, in the trial of the party, E reported the wall and stated that the defendant and the victim did not see a dispute over the fighting because it did not refuse to do so at the time, and ② E submitted a written statement stating that “At the time of the case, E did not attend as a witness, rather than in the trial of the court below, the victim was booming the roof on the following day after the victim was brued with booming the Defendant, and the Defendant was tightly boomed with the Defendant, and the victim was able to receive brued treatment.” In the trial of the party, the victim is also deemed to have failed to go