Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is the vice president of the company B located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, who is a person in charge of safety and health management of the E golf course creation work performed by the above company.

In the event that the collapse of a structure is likely to cause danger to workers, the business owner must take necessary measures to prevent the risk, but the defendant, at around 07:20 on July 23, 2014, performed a preparatory work for piling up stone at a scale of 5 meters high by the victim F (the age of 65) after executing construction works differently from design drawings and specifications at the construction site of the above E golf course at the above E golf course at a level of 07:20 on July 23, 2014, the above tin-scale fall at a level of 5 meters, and eventually, the victim fell at a level of 5 meters and eventually caused the victim to die at a level, and eventually caused a bruptic death due to a dyching fre at a mountain hospital located in the 170-gu, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoyang-gu, 2014.

2. 피고인 주식회사 B 피고인은 토목건축공사업 등을 목적으로 설립된 법인이다.

A, an employee of the defendant, did not take necessary measures to prevent the risk of collapse of structures as above with respect to the defendant's business at the time and place of the above Paragraph 1, thereby causing the death of the worker.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning G;

1. A report on occurrence of serious accidents;

1. Submission of a disaster investigation report;

1. Standard contract form for private construction works and each modification contract;

1. Business registration certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the appointment of field agents;

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

A. Defendant A: Articles 66-2 and 23(3) of the Industrial Safety and Health Act as stated in the applicable provisions of the same Act in relation to Defendant A appears to be simple.

(Selection of Fine)

B. Defendant B: the scale of the instant construction contract and the Defendants’ aforementioned construction contract under Articles 71, 66-2, and 23(3) of the Industrial Safety and Health Act.