logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.06.30 2015고정1227
도로교통법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person who is engaged in driving service of Mazher 80 c).

On October 16, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 02:42, the Defendant changed the front road of Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City into the four-lane course in the direction of the new forest path from the bell basin of the Dobong River.

In such cases, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the motor vehicle, such as taking the front left well, accurately manipulating the steering gear, brake system, etc.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and neglected to perform his duty in the Jeonju City, thereby going against his negligence.

The back part of the left-hand panion of the D Lasta vehicle driven by the victim C(58 years old) who was stopped at the four-lanes, conflict with the right-hand side of the E-wheeled vehicle, thereby resulting in physical damage of KRW 723,718.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) while under the influence of alcohol with 0.153% of blood alcohol concentration at a temporary border such as paragraph (1) of this Article, the Defendant driven a 80cc ambama on the front day of the day from the front day of the day operated by the Defendant of Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul to the front day of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City B.

3. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is the owner of Mazan 80 ciopia.

No automobile which is not covered by the mandatory insurance shall be operated on a road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated the said vehicle that was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place, such as Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written estimate of general repair expenses;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a certificate of drinking alcohol measurement and a written statement of traffic accident occurrence;

1. Article 148-2 (2) 2 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of sound driving) concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the negligence on duty under Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act;

arrow