1. The defendant is against the plaintiffs:

(a) Of the real estate listed in the separate sheet, each of 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 3 of the specifications indicated in the separate sheet.

1. Indication of claim;

A. On November 22, 201, Plaintiff A entered into a contract with the Defendant to lease a part of 39.52 square meters (hereinafter “instant real estate”) connected in order to each point of the real estate indicated in the separate sheet in which the Plaintiffs shared one-half shares, among the real estate listed in the separate sheet in which the Plaintiffs shared one-half shares, to the Defendant (hereinafter “instant lease contract”).

B. From June 2016, the Defendant was in arrears and the Plaintiff A expressed his/her intent to terminate the instant lease agreement to the Defendant on or around January 24, 2017, and the instant lease agreement was terminated.

C. The Defendant is no longer entitled to possess the instant real estate, and the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiffs, and the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiffs KRW 2 million each on the grounds of unjust enrichment equivalent to the monthly rent or rent due to the possession of the instant real estate during the period from June 2016 to February 2017.

2. Judgment with no applicable provisions of Acts (Articles 208 (3) 1 and 257 of the Civil Procedure Act);