(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.08.29 2017고정1789

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.08.29 2017고정1789

사기

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 22, 2016, the Defendant came to know with the victim B through the reciting Doo "bao" around June 2, 2016, and is expected to take over the D principal station located in G in G in Gyeonggi-do, which is the president of the D principal station located in G, which is in a foreign country, our Myma lives in Korea around July 15, 2016, and will take care of it from the other canal wells located in Pyeong-si.

The Defendant introduced the Defendant to the effect that “” was the same, and the victim was returned to Maranam-do before the same day, and the victim was released from Maranam-do on June 23, 2016 to 20:0:00 to 20:00 on June 23, 2016.

1. On June 24, 2016, the Defendant got out of order to the victim at Gannam-do, Gannam-do.

There is no cash for now, and there is no money for the head of the Gu. It is false that money is repaid on the next week as the cash enters the gas station.”

However, the fact was that the defendant did not operate the gas station, but invested 10 million won in the person operating the gas station, and the profits from the gas station could not be used as the defendant's mind, and there was no particular property or income, so even if he borrowed money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to repay it.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired 2.5 million won from the victim to the KEB bank account in the name of E under the pretext of borrowing money.

2. The Defendant, on June 24, 2016, again fell from the Defendant around 21:00 on June 24, 2016, how the card’s limit is.

The term “the money that the horse has to return to the Republic of Korea in the name of a large amount of oil, etc., so that the horse has to return to the Republic of Korea, and there is no money due to the lack of a card, etc., and that the horse makes a false statement that the horse has to return to the Republic of Korea when it returns to the Republic of Korea.”

However, the facts are lending the victim's card for the same reasons as the statement in paragraph 1.

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 홍성지원 2016.11.10 2016고정113

-광주지방법원 목포지원 2014.02.20 2013고단1626

-광주지방법원 2018.12.20 2018고단575

-서울동부지방법원 2021.01.12 2020가단125307

-수원지방법원 평택지원 2017.11.09 2017고단482