logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 밀양지원 2017.11.02 2017고단232
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, even if there is no objective basis for the symptoms of the patients, presented a medical doctor’s opinion in both banks, and written confirmation of entrance and discharge, etc. at the request of the patient, and even after the hospitalization, repeated hospitalization was made several times for a long time by not actually hospitalized after the hospitalization, or receiving only a outpatient treatment, by using the fact that the patient is allowed to undergo outpatient treatment, and that the patient is allowed to undergo outpatient treatment at the request of the patient. Based on this, the Defendant and the son and the E, attempted to receive insurance money by claiming insurance money from each insurance company subscribed in the name of both the Defendant and son.

On August 31, 2001, the Defendant subscribed to a total of 6 insurance companies up to September 5, 201, by up to September 5, 201, for the purchase of non-distribution insurance products under its own name, and subscribed to a total of 2 insurance companies up to October 29, 2008, such as a family love insurance to cover a non-distribution of a fire insurance company in the interesting country under its name, and subscribed to a total of 2 insurance companies up to October 29, 2008 under its own name, including a family love insurance. Around July 9, 2009, the Defendant subscribed to a total of 2 insurance companies up to July 9, 2009, such as an insurance policy.

1. The Defendant’s false hospitalization was hospitalized in the above Category C oriental medical hospital under the name of “knee-free kne-shne-shacker certificate” for twenty (20) days from December 19, 201 to January 7, 2012.

However, such a name of sick was available for outpatient treatment such as pharmacologic treatment, so there was no symptoms to the extent that it does not interfere with daily life even without being hospitalized, and the defendant did not actually be hospitalized due to the reason that he was a restaurant for maintaining his livelihood.

Nevertheless, on January 9, 2012, the Defendant received normal hospitalization from the above hospital for 20 days for the victim so that he/she was hospitalized.

arrow