Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a dump truck as his/her duties.

On February 13, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 10:50 on February 13, 2017, and started with the front three-distance crosswalk, Sinsan, Sinsan, Sinsan, 80 on the front side of Sinsan, with the signal signal from LG electronic room to the front side of Sinsan.

At this point, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the front side and the left side and the left side and the steering system of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and caused the defendant's negligence to go from the right side of the vehicle driving direction of the defendant's seal to the left side of the crosswalk signal, etc., and the victim D (V, 49 years old) who was going to go to the crosswalk when the signal of the crosswalk is red.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim to die on the spot due to the aforementioned occupational negligence, such as the blood shock.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Results of viewing the CCTV for crime prevention;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the injured party would normally turn to the left after receiving a left-hand turn signal from the defendant's vehicle, while the survey report on the actual situation, an accident scene photograph, and a corpse inspection report, and the defendant and his defense counsel were crossing the defendant's vehicle without permission. Even if the defendant fulfilled his/her duty of care, he/she appears that the accident in this case could not be avoided, and thus the defendant

The argument is asserted.

The defendant is the following circumstances, i.e., the location of the accident is a three-distance from the front side of the defendant's vehicle, because the victim is found to have attempted to cross the vehicle without getting off the bicycle among the signal signal on the crosswalk. However, the defendant is the defendant, as it is recognized that the above evidence is reflected in the sentencing.