logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2017.04.07 2015가단42914
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) to Plaintiff A, KRW 5,473,954; and (b) to Plaintiff B, KRW 500,000; and each of them, from October 16, 2013 to April 7, 2017.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs are married with each other, and the Defendant is the mutual aid business operator of C-high speed buses owned by Non-Party Geum-ho Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant accident vehicle”).

B. around October 16, 2013, Plaintiff A, on board the instant vehicle for the instant accident of a person who was unable to drive his name at Pyeongtaek bus terminal, around October 16, 2013, was locked while getting out of the Seoul High-speed bus terminal. However, Plaintiff A suffered injury, such as divers, perfore, finites, and cerebral finites, etc., in need of approximately two weeks’ medical treatment away from the head of Plaintiff A.

(hereinafter “the instant traffic accident”). 【The ground for recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, Gap Nos. 1 through 3 (including paper numbers), the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. According to the facts underlying the occurrence of liability for damages, the defendant is liable to compensate the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the instant traffic accident as the mutual aid business operator of the instant accident vehicle, unless there are special circumstances.

B. In the absence of any dispute, the Plaintiffs asserted that, as to the scope of compensation for damages, Gap's evidence Nos. 5 and 6 (including the branch number), the result of the physical examination commission to the director of the Korea National University Hospital (as of November 30, 2016, D and E), the results of the physical examination commission to the director of the Korea National University Hospital (as of January 8, 2016, F and Medical Proceedings G), the inquiry inquiry inquiry inquiry inquiry inquiry (as of August 10, 2016), and the inquiry inquiry inquiry inquiry inquiry inquiry (as of January 13, 2017), it is difficult for the Plaintiff to maintain fairness and neutrality in performing the physical examination at a place where the Plaintiff had received an outpatient treatment in the first place following the traffic accident in this case (as of the Plaintiff's physical examination of the head of the Korea National University Hospital, it is reasonable to adopt the results of the physical examination of the above body diagnosis of the deceased National University, and thus, it is reasonable to accept the physical examination of the above body diagnosis.

(1) Daily income 1.

arrow