Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

Defendant

A fails to pay the above fine; 50.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On June 13, 2001, the Defendant violated the Housing Act was an internal director of a company B, the trade name of which was changed from CConstruction Co., Ltd., and C Construction Co., Ltd. was ordered to suspend housing construction works within Jin-gun and 7 lots.

Nevertheless, around July 5, 2011, the Defendant, as a responsible manager at the above site housing construction site, performed internal finishing construction in violation of the above suspension order.

B. On June 12, 2001, when a building owner constructs a building, he/she shall designate a construction supervisor and have him/her supervise the construction work, and on June 12, 2001, a supervisor of the said housing construction work completed the construction work.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not have a construction supervisor supervise the construction work at the same time and place as above.

2. Defendant B Co., Ltd. is a corporation established for the purpose of housing construction business, etc. in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do.

As stated in paragraph (1), the Defendant, an employee of the Defendant, violated the Housing Act and the Building Act by violating the order to suspend construction as stated in the Defendant’s work and by performing interior finishing work without being supervised by construction work.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. F's self-written statement;

1. Application of an accusation, field photograph, direction for discontinuance of construction, confirmation, and a certified copy of the register;

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

(a) Defendant A: Article 98 Subparag. 12 and Article 91 of the Housing Act, Article 110 Subparag. 4(a) and the former part of Article 25(1) of the Building Act;

(b) Defendant B: Articles 100(2), 98 subparag. 12, and 91 of the Housing Act, Article 112(3), Article 110 subparag. 4, and the former part of Article 25(1) of the Building Act

1. It appears that there were purposes of managing a building in the process of selective fine, and its scale is not significant.