logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.12.05 2018누57119
종합소득세등부과처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, such as admitting the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance, is as stated in the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance (excluding the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance excluding the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance excluding the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance excluding the corresponding part of the judgment

2. The revised 6th 6th 2 pages “....,” and the revised 6th 7th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 7th 7th 7th 6th 7th 6th 7th 7th 6th 6th 6th 3rd 6th 6th 3rd 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 7th 300,000 the Plaintiff’s 30th 1st 16th 6th 300 m 100 m 30.

[] According to the revised statement of evidence Nos. 10, 11, and 13, the plaintiff asserted that the above apartment was owned by K during the pertinent taxable period. However, according to the plaintiff's statement of evidence Nos. 10, 11, and 13, it can be recognized that the plaintiff continued to purchase the above apartment through T and paid any balance and acquisition tax, etc., and in light of this, K seems to be merely the nominal owner.

8) The following is added to the right side of the 7rd page below the 8th page "(the plaintiff W shall be the plaintiff.

arrow