The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is erroneous in matters of law by misunderstanding the facts charged and affecting the conclusion of the judgment by finding the defendant guilty, even though the defendant did not have the victim's desire to talk about the victim's monthly problem while hearing that the victim was unable to make a monthly rent to her husband, and the victim sought the above restaurant to talk about the victim's monthly problem with her husband.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, D, the victim witness consistently agreed to this court from the police to the point of time, and the defendant's promise was made. The next defect was made, and the defendant expressed his desire as stated in the facts charged. At the time, 3-4 table visitors were present at the time, but the 3-4 table visitors were put up, but the f was going out of the defendant. He stated that "I went out of the defendant." At the time, H, an employee at the restaurant, stated that "I was unable to listen to the defendant in detail at the time, but I tried to listen to the defendant's desire to take out of the prison," and that "I continued to listen to the defendant and the employee's desire to take out," and "I want to come out of the prison and the employee."

The defendant was living alone upon the request of the victim.