1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. Basic facts

A. On April 18, 2014, the Plaintiff had an interview with the general programming channel E press and the media in relation to D. The interview was broadcasted on April 18, 2014, and the article about the Plaintiff was reported by several media organizations.

B. On April 29, 2014, Nonparty F’s reporter posted the URL of the Plaintiff as the title “H” to “G,” and Defendant B prepared and posted the comments “J” in the name of “I” on the same day.

C. On April 21, 2014, Defendant C prepared and posted the word “N” under the name of “K” under the title of “M”.

[Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 3 and 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the Defendants committed an unlawful act of insulting the Plaintiff by posting an abstract judgment that may undermine the Plaintiff’s social reputation or a comments or comments containing sacrific sentiment against the Plaintiff on the Internet website bulletin board where many unspecified or many unspecified persons access, and thus, the Defendants are obligated to compensate for mental suffering suffered by the Plaintiff.

Furthermore, the amount of consolation money shall be set at KRW 100,000, respectively, by comprehensively taking into account the various circumstances shown in the arguments, such as the frequency and contents of each comments posted by the Defendants, the reasons for writing comments, and the circumstances after writing comments.

Therefore, Defendant B is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum under the Civil Act, from April 29, 2014, which is the date of tort, and from April 21, 2014, which is the date of tort, from April 21, 2014, each of the Defendants, as to the existence or scope of the duty to perform, as to the existence or the scope of the duty to perform, from April 21, 2014, to November 10, 2017, which is the date of the first instance judgment, and from the following day to the date of full payment, 5% per annum under the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings.

3. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants is within the scope of the above recognition.