logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.02.10 2015고단161
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of 8 months, Defendant B’s imprisonment and fine of 5,00,000 won, Defendant C’s fine of 2,000,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The first single criminal defendant A operated an officetel entertainment business establishment in the name of “F” under the name of “F” by leasing No. 102, Dong 330, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon. At around September 13, 2014, the defendant arranged commercial sex acts as shown in the attached Table I, from the time of November 16, 2014, by receiving 150,000 won from the male grandchildren who visited the above business establishment, and by having the female employees (e.g., the name “G”) sexual intercourse with the above male grandchildren by November 16, 2014.

2. The Defendants’ co-principaled Defendant A, who operated the said “F” sexual traffic business, was gathered to operate the said business at the same time after being introduced from Defendant B and Defendant C, who is an employee, due to the difficulties in business such as the failure of management expenses, etc.

The Defendants: (a) operated an officetel entertainment business in the name of “H” under the leased Nos. 102, 618, 828, 103 and 615, and 1024; and (b) conspired with I to receive KRW 1.40,00 from 1 to 3, 2014; and (c) let female employees J provide sexual intercourse with the said I; and (d) arranged commercial sex acts as shown in Appendix II from November 18, 2014 to December 3, 2014.

3. Defendant A’s second single criminal conduct, as described in paragraph (2), was engaged in the brokerage business of commercial sex acts with B and C, and was controlled by the police, and, for the purpose of securing living expenses, Defendant A continued to engage in commercial sex acts against customers who found the existing “F” and “H”.

The Defendant operates a commercial sex business establishment with the trade name “K”, which continues to exist in the said Etel Nos. 102, 615, and 618, from around December 5, 2014 to around December 23, 2014, the Defendant received 140,000 won from the male grandchildren on the name of the above business establishment from the male grandchildren on the name of the above business owner and had the above male grandchildren (L) sexual intercourse with the above male grandchildren, etc. from around December 5, 2014.

arrow