logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.01.30 2014고단9509
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 17, 2014, at around 16:00, the Defendant expressed that he was dissatisfied with the issuance of a summary order for a separate injury case at the Incheon Southern Police Station criminal watch room located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Incheon, Seonam Police Station, which was located in 290-ro 32, the Defendant expressed that he “when he is sentenced to a fine that was frighten in the opening and head of the Gu” to a slope C belonging to the above police station, who is working for the said police station, “when he is sentenced to a fine that was frighten in the opening and head of the Gu,” and that he turn a son with a mother, as he

The Defendant, due to the above behavior, moved out of the watchkeeping room with other police officers, and re-in the front of the above police station's entrance into the watchkeeping room, and avoided the disturbance by the slope C, thereby making the face of the slope C one time on the left side of the slope C as drinking.

As above, the Defendant assaulted a police officer to interfere with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the suppression, prevention, and investigation of a crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. The relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the grounds for sentencing choice of imprisonment, and the reasons for sentencing;

1. The scope of the sentencing guidelines for recommendation [the scope of the sentencing guidelines] the basic area (six months to one year and four months) of the obstruction of the performance of official duties (the obstruction of the performance of official duties) (the scope of the sentence for recommendation];

2. In light of favorable circumstances, the fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and against whom the sentence was rendered, the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of suspension of execution, even though he/she had been punished for the same kind of crime, shall be considered as unfavorable circumstances, and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance leading to the instant crime, and circumstances after the commission of the crime shall be determined as ordered.

arrow