Defendant

A Imprisonment for two years, Defendant B is punished by a fine of KRW 10 million, Defendant C is punished by a fine of KRW 30 million.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is a person who has lent the name of the business operator to Defendant A, Defendant A is the actual representative of the I building at the time of Gyeonggi-do and the C Co., Ltd. in 912, and Defendant C is a corporation that runs the construction business, the housing construction business, etc.

1. Defendant B and Defendant A’s joint crime committed committed the following acts: (a) Defendant B was willing to establish a corporation for the purpose of leasing a construction license and was found to have borrowed the name of its representative; and (b) Defendant B was offered to Defendant B only in a park located in the Seocho-dong Seoul Special Myeonnman on June 2016, and (c) Defendant B was offered to “on the face of lending the name of its director in order to establish a construction enterprise, he would subscribe to four insurance in return for the said name and pay KRW 20 million in return.” (c) Defendant B consented thereto.

Defendant

B In fact, although there was no intention to work as a director of the construction company, in the above park, five copies of each of the resident registration, abstract, seal imprint, certificate of personal seal impression, family relation certificate, and identification certificate were issued to the defendant A, and the defendant A transferred the above documents again to the "J" which is the hub for the establishment of the corporation.

Accordingly, on June 23, 2016, J had K prepare and submit an application for change registration of corporation C to the inside director B in Busan District Court, which is located in the Busan District Court as the Busan District Court on the registration of the Busan District Court on the 31st day of June, 2016.

Therefore, the employee in charge of the above registry office who knows the fact was allowed to enter the contents of the inside director of the corporation C into Defendant B in the electronic information system for registration of the corporation, which is an official electronic record, so that he can store and read the above register stating false facts.

As a result, in collusion with J, the Defendants made false reports to the public official to record false facts in the same electronic records as the original copy of the fairness deed, and exercised them.

2. Defendant A constructor shall be another person.