logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.05.27 2013고합726
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(성매수등)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 20,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 05:00 on August 11, 2013, the Defendant: (a) stopped the Cununst car driving on the side in the high speed road between the arms of the free zone located in the Pacific-si and the pedestrian zone in the ancient city; (b) promised that the victim D (the age of 14) who known that he/she was a child or juvenile, would provide him/her with a lodging and give him/her a money; and (c) promised that the victim D (the age of 14) was aware that he/she was a child or juvenile; and (d) sexual intercourse with the victim to purchase the child or juvenile sex.

2. Around 00:00 on August 13, 2013, the Defendant stopped the said car that he/she driven at a parking lot for a parking lot for a parking lot on the mutual sponsing side of the racing from the Suwon Highway, and had the victim and the victim purchase the sex of the child and youth by selling it twice in the above manner.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of the statutes governing Kakao Stockholm letters;

1. Article 13 (1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, which provides relevant legal provisions and select punishment for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 21(2) main text and Article 21(4) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse is that the Defendant provided accommodation and money to a juvenile released from home to the victim and provided them three times in return, and the Defendant, an adult who has a social responsibility to protect the juvenile so that he/she may have a sound sexual morality and lead him/her to a correct way, and even if his/her awareness of sex was created properly, it is very poor that a sex crime against the juvenile was committed for the purpose of resolving his/her sexual desire.

arrow