(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.12.04 2015노691

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.12.04 2015노691

상해

Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal: ① the fact that the victim D was assaulted by the defendant and his behaviors, ② the police officer I called the victim D as the perpetrator; ③ the defendant's behavior in the course of arresting the defendant; ③ all E, F, and G have the same interest as the defendant; ④ the defendant attempted to reach an agreement with D in the course of investigation, despite the fact that the defendant could be recognized as having inflicted an injury by price jointly with E, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant of the facts charged of this case, is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts that affected the conclusion of the judgment.

(On the other hand, the defendant appealed on October 21, 2015 against the judgment of innocence rendered by the court below. However, on November 13, 2015, the defendant withdrawn the appeal on the first trial of the court of first instance on November 13, 2015. 2.

A. On April 13, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 00:35, the summary of the facts charged: (b) the Defendant: (c) the victim D (39 years of age) who was laid off in the scambling scam in the scambling of the Defendant on the ground that the owner of the scambling shop located in Soyang-gu, Soyang-gu; (d) the owner of the scam was under the influence of alcohol; and (e) the victim D (39 years of age) who was kept in the scambling in the scambling of the Defendant; and (e) the Defendant, who was under the Defendant’s scambling of the scambling of the Defendant, had the victim’s face three times with the scam and the Defendant also had the victim’s face four times of drinking.

As a result, the Defendant, in collaboration with E, sustained a wound of approximately 1§¯ in which the number of treatment days cannot be known to the victim.

B. The lower court’s judgment and the lower court stated the following circumstances, i.e., (i) the victim D was faced with several persons, including the first Defendant, but at the time of making a statement of witness at the police station.

유사 판례

-의정부지방법원 고양지원 2015.02.06 2014고정967

-서울북부지방법원 2013.07.24 2013노599

-부산지방법원 2014.06.27 2014노384

-울산지방법원 2016.12.15 2015고단1220

-대전지방법원 홍성지원 2013.02.27 2013고정49