Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 18, 2017, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) was boarding a taxi for business use operated by B in the vicinity of the new forest station located in the south-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Southern-ro 1614; (b) did not pay KRW 5,640, and did not pay KRW 5,640, without good cause, even though he/she arrived at the regular text of the Seoul University located in the Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

2. On November 18, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the Seoul University (Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City University’s 1, 2017, where he received a report and requested the Defendant to leave the taxi as stated in the foregoing 1.3, the Defendant interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the prevention, suppression, and investigation of police officers’ crimes, by making the Defendant leave the taxi as stated in the foregoing 1.3.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. B written statements;

1. Application of the receipt statute

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 136(1) of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act; Article 3(1)39 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act; and selection of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include: (a) the fact that the defendant recognized the crime and seriously reflects the defendant; (b) the degree of damage and the degree of interference with the performance of official duties is relatively minor; (c) the defendant seems to have caused the crime of this case by contingency; (d) the defendant has no record of committing the crime at all; and (e) other circumstances, such as the defendant’s age, sex, conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and the sentencing conditions specified in the argument of this case, are considered.