A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around 10:00 on January 2, 2020, the Defendant received a proposal from a member of the telephone financial fraud (so-called “Sing,” hereinafter referred to as “Singing”) and a telephone counsel with respect to loans for living expenses from an employee in the name of the Defendant, who misrepresented B Bank C as a proxy, and then gave a loan to KRW 10,000,000,000,000 from the above person in the name of the Defendant. In addition, the Defendant received a proposal from the above person in the name of the Defendant to the effect that “if he deposits money into the account, he will cause the employee D to find and directly deliver the account number of the E deposit account (F) in the name of the Defendant, and then notified the above person in the name of the name.”

In the name of the employee under the supervision of the Minister of Trade, Industry and Energy is a violation of the Credit Financial Transactions Act, the amount of KRW 10 million which has been extended to 27 million in the last year is 10 million, by misrepresenting the G Company H agency, the I team leader of the Financial Supervisory Service, the computer team, etc., and in order to make a loan to the victim J. in a telephone, 45 million won, and 4.5%.

If all of the loans are not repaid, a compulsory collection shall be made from 1.5 to 2 times.

“A false statement is made with the content of “A”, and the victim was paid KRW 27.2 million in the above E deposit account in the Defendant’s name on or around the 3th of the same month, and KRW 6.1 million in the K Industrial Bank’s deposit account (L) around the 6th of the same month, respectively, and received KRW 33.3 million in total.

After the Defendant’s month

3. At around 11:56, the Plaintiff withdrawn KRW 27 million from the above account while recognizing the fact that the amount deposited in the above E deposit account at the intersection of the MM association located in the Young-gu Busan Metropolitan City, and thereafter, the Plaintiff sent to the Plaintiff one who instructed the Plaintiff of the above name in front of the exit No. 3 of the Nampo-gu, Nampo-gu, Busan Metropolitan City.

As a result, the Defendant aided and aided the crime of fraud by deceiving the victim by means of phishing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the defendant;