1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The fact that, at the time of the occurrence of the basic fact-finding accident, the Plaintiff’s insured vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant’s insured vehicle”) that was driven by the Plaintiff’s insured vehicle CD temporarily 08:0 on March 5, 2019 at the time of the occurrence of the basic fact-finding accident, in the direction of the four-lane collision situation near the E, Dongdong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) entered the intersection at a rapid speed from the two-lane crossing to the two-lane crossing, has lost the balance between the Plaintiff’s vehicle and the Defendant’s insured vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant’s vehicle”) seeking to avoid the accident, and caused the injury to the passengers of the damaged vehicle, the Plaintiff’s insured vehicle’s payment amounted to KRW 13,015,700 (F and expenses for repairing the damaged Party I’s treatment and agreement) 1).

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's right to indemnity

A. The following circumstances, which are acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the evidence and the purport of the entire pleadings as revealed in the above recognition of the error ratio, i.e., the driver of any motor vehicle shall not change the course when it is likely to impede the normal traffic of other motor vehicles running in the direction to change the course (Article 19(3) of the Road Traffic Act), and the driver of any motor vehicle intends to change the course to a two-lane course without checking the location, speed, etc. of the motor vehicle running along the two-lane side as the motor vehicle is set on the front side of the motor vehicle.