1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B: (a) KRW 963,761,01 and 5% per annum from May 31, 2011 to December 20, 2018;

1. The plaintiff's assertion

A. After calculating the excessive amount of monetary expenses, Defendant B served as the chief researcher belonging to the Sincheon-si, China, and Defendant D served as the Plaintiff’s employee in the CAV ( Converg Audio Vides), Defendant B and D conspired with the Plaintiff’s employee to refund the amount of monetary expenses to be invested in the ODM companies, which caused the Plaintiff to pay the amount of monetary expenses to be paid off, which caused the Plaintiff to incur losses by acquiring the amount equivalent to the amount of the unrefed difference, and Defendant C participated in the above illegal acts by Defendant B.

B. Defendant B established Hong Kong Corporation E (hereinafter “E”) around April 2008, which received unfair profits through intermediate companies, and the parts of the parts involved in the transaction process of supplying parts to the Plaintiff’s ODM companies, thereby obtaining unjust profits by supplying parts to the ODM companies at a high unit price with E profit added to E’s unit price. Accordingly, the Plaintiff suffered losses by making a transaction with the ODM companies at a high unit price, which includes E’s profit.

C. Defendant B received rebates in return for convenience in the selection of specific video and audio ODM companies. Defendant C took part in Defendant B’s tort by providing Defendant B’s account to use the rebates acquired by Defendant B. (2) Defendant B and D participated in the selection of audio ODM companies and obtained rebates in return.

3. Accordingly, the Plaintiff suffered losses from receiving products at a high-level unit price, in which rebates was reflected.

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. 1) Evidence Nos. 2, 3, 9, 18, 21, 27, 31, 32, 39, 40, 41, and 43 (the number of additional numbers) as to whether tort liability is established following the computation of excessive penalties.