logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.04.10 2013고정3654
업무상과실장물취득
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was the employee of the (main) CC who was a company purchasing buphones.

1. At around 15:00 on January 8, 2013 - around 17:00, the Defendant had F (23 years of age and South) purchase two smartphone points on the market price to E located in Suwon-si Line D.

In such cases, the defendant, who is engaged in the business of selling used goods, has a duty of care to verify the personal information of the F, etc. of the customer, and to check whether the mobile phone acquisition process, motive for sale, and the price suitable for the transaction price is demanded.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected the above care and neglected the judgment on the stolen, but acquired the stolen by purchasing the two points of the above smartphones in KRW 230,000 by negligence.

2. On February 7, 2013, the Defendant purchased one smartphone in the market price from the above F at the same place as the above criminal facts paragraph 1.

In such cases, the defendant, who is engaged in the business of selling used goods, has a duty of care to verify the personal information of the F, etc. of the customer, and to check whether the mobile phone acquisition process, motive for sale, and the price suitable for the transaction price is demanded.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to pay the above attention and neglected to make a judgment on the stolen, but purchased 70,000 won of the above smartphone and acquired the stolen property.

3. On February 27, 2013: 13:00 - the Defendant had I (22 years of age and South) purchase any smartphone in the city of the city from H located in Suwon-si G in Suwon-si, Suwon-si.

In such cases, the defendant, who is engaged in the business of selling used goods, has the duty of care to verify the personal information, etc. of customers, and to check the mobile phone acquisition process, motive for selling, and whether the price suitable for the transaction prices is demanded.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected the above care and neglected the stolen.

arrow