logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2015.08.10 2015고단372
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동협박)등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants violated the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint intimidation) around 15:25 on April 29, 2015, 2015, at the “G” house operated by the Victim F (F, F, 42 years of age) E, Defendant A expressed a desire to “I would like to see that I would like to do so if I would like to do so, I would like to do so, if I would like to do so, I would like to see if I would like to do so, I would like to do so, and if I would like to see if I would like to see if I would like to do so, I would like to see that I would like to see that I would have been in North Korea, and I would like to see that I would like to see that I would have been in the first place in North Korea, and as I would like to put the victim in their own arms, I would threaten the victim in the way of threatening, and Defendant C would threaten the victim.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly threatened the victim.

2. The Defendants in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint destruction and damage, etc.) ordered Defendant B and Defendant C to “Y,” for the foregoing reasons at the same time and place, and destroyed the entrance doors owned by the said victim, where the market price cannot be determined by leaving the beer’s disease inside the cooling house, and then leaving the beer’s door inside the cooling house. Defendant C dricked the glass windows owned by the said victim, where the market price cannot be determined, and Defendant B dricked the beer’s caner, and Defendant B dricked the beer’s beer’s beer in the restaurant glass, and dracked the beer’s beer’s beer’s beer and racker’s beer’s beer and racker’s free door, where the market price cannot be determined due to the racker’s being found.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly damaged the property owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to take photographs of crime scene and records thereof;

1. The relevant Article of the facts constituting an offense and the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act;

arrow