beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (AFS) is a person who is engaged in the operation of a Cbea cruise car.
On August 9, 2014, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.116% in blood on August 9, 2014, and continued to drive the said car at a speed of about 20km per hour from the Hannam-ro 34-gil, Yongsan-gu Embassy-gu, Seoul, to the Hannam-ro 5-gil, the Hannam-ro, the Hannam-ro, the Hannam-ro, the south-ro
At that time, the part on the right side of the vehicle operated by the defendant is in conflict with the part on the left side of the E-motor vehicle driven by D which changes the way from the two-lane to the one-lane, so in such a case, the driver has a duty of care to operate the steering system and the brake properly according to the surrounding traffic conditions, by taking necessary on-site measures, such as checking damage, and by taking necessary on-site measures, if the driver is to drive again, the driver has a duty of care to operate the steering system and the brake properly.
Nevertheless, on the ground that the Defendant neglected to take clothes to a police officer who was sent to the scene of an accident while under the influence of alcohol, and went away from the above bed, and does not properly look at the steering gear and operation system, and the part of the back part of the Gra-owned passenger vehicle owned by the victim F, which was parked on the right side of the road due to negligence in operating the steering gear and operation system properly, conflicts with the above part of the victim F, which was parked on the right side of the cruise passenger vehicle, and the victim H owned by the victim, who was parked on the left side of the road while changing course to the opposite line, and was parked on the left side of the vehicle, and continued to drive the above part of the back part of the passenger vehicle owned by the victim, which was parked on the left side of the road.
Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence on the part of the above business is to exchange the pertinent radar car with the back-winger.