Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months, and by imprisonment without prison labor for four months.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who drives E TlaXG car, Defendant B is a person who drives FIO car.

Defendant

A, around June 15, 2014, around 20:10, the three-lane roads in the front of the Hedo located in the G in the Jamh City at a speed of about 60 km per hour depending on the one-lane from the surface of the sewage terminal treatment plant in the new month to the gold apartment room.

At the time, there is a frequent funeral hall in the vicinity of the people at night and there is a frequent funeral hall. As such, Defendant A engaged in driving service has a duty of care to thoroughly operate the boom and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right

Nevertheless, as long as Defendant A neglected to do so and neglected to do so, Defendant A did not discover the victim I (52 years of age) who crosses the road from the right side of the defendant's proceeding to the left side and did not use the part of the victim's bridge in the front part of the above Tra XG car, and had the victim use the part of the victim's bridge on the first line of the opposite direction.

Defendant

B, at the same time and place, the above road was proceeding from the gold apartment room to the J side, at a speed of about 40 km per hour, over the middle of 1 and 2 lanes.

In such cases, Defendant B, who is engaged in driving service, has a duty of care to thoroughly keep the front door and the left door door, secure a sufficient safety distance with the front vehicle, and cope with the unexpected situation and prevent the accident from spreading.

Nevertheless, Defendant B neglected to do so and neglected to ensure the safety distance, but failed to find the victim on the road due to occupational negligence, and did not discover the victim on the road, and the part with the wheels of the driver's seat of the rocketing car was the body part of the victim.

The Defendants’ death by occupational negligence caused the victim to have cerebrovassis from the workplace.