1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the claims filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) expanded and selected in the trial are dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is as follows. With respect to the claim of the principal suit which the plaintiff had selectedly added in the trial of the court of first instance, this part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the determination as follows 2. Thus, this part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of

[Attachment, I add “M” to “M” following the second page 14 of the judgment of the court of first instance. The fourth page 5-6 of the judgment of the court of first instance (“M”). “I, around April 2014, entered the land in question, entered the land in question, was originally planned to be entered into the land in question, and came into the land in question on May 2014, I added “I testimony of the witness of the court of first instance” to “I” in the fourth page of the judgment of the court of first instance. On the other hand, I reported “I” from the court of first instance to the Defendant’s temporary entry into the land in question without the Defendant’s consent to the temporary entry into the land in question, and I reported “I” to the Defendant’s temporary entry into the land in question without the Defendant’s consent to the temporary entry into the land in question, and the Plaintiff did not hear the Plaintiff’s consent to the temporary entry into the land in question from the first instance court to the Defendant’s temporary entry into the land in question.”