The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the original court’s imprisonment (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination that the defendant does not repeat the same mistake, and it seems that the issue of the outstanding amount that occurred while engaging in the construction business could become economically difficult and economically difficult, and the defendant's active statement and cooperation in the investigation may be sufficiently taken into account. However, there is no circumstance to change the situation favorable to the defendant in light of all the circumstances favorable to the defendant, and there is no circumstance to change it in the trial. The crime of acquiring stolen property is not only a crime that may stimulate the crime of this case by participating in realizing the profit of the victim, but also it is not good that the nature of the crime is not recovered; the defendant has the same criminal history; the defendant has been sentenced to suspension of execution for violating the Road Traffic Act in Seoul Southern District Court on June 2, 2011; the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for violation of the Road Traffic Act; and the defendant did not reach the age of the defendant during the grace period, and the defendant did not reach the age of the crime of this case and did not reach the age of this case.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.