logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2018.06.01 2018고단732
재물손괴등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Damage to property;

A. On December 4, 2017, at around 20:50, the Defendant: (a) walked the victim E-owner, who was installed in front of the “D” restaurant located in Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si; and (b) destroyed the Defendant’s damage to cover some parts of the front part of the Ortop, thereby destroying the repair cost.

B. On December 4, 2017, at around 20:55, the Defendant damaged the repair cost by putting the victim’s monitors installed in the “HPC car page” operated by the victim G in Bupyeong-si F and the second floor on his 2017, with a monitor owned by the victim, and destroying part of the vehicle by walking a large-sized wind engine.

(c)

On December 4, 2017, the police officer sent to the site at around 21:07 B. B. at around 21:07, asked the defendant about his personal information, thereby causing damage to the repair cost of the vehicle in addition to the part of the volume of the vehicle by walking a book on the account books owned by G.

2. On December 4, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 20:57 around 1-B; (b) on December 4, 2017, at the same place as Paragraph 1-B, the Defendant, without any justifiable reason, assaulted the victim when the Defendant gets off his/her arms with the victim I, who is the customer.

3. On December 4, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties: (a) around 21:08, at the same place as a port No. 1-B; (b) and (b) on the ground that he was arrested by the police officer of the JJ District Police Station of the Seocheon-gu Seoul Special Police Station of the JJ District on the ground that he was arrested him as a flagrant offender, thereby obstructing the Defendant’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the suppression and investigation of the police officer’s crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to K in the police statement;

1. Each written statement concerning E, I, and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the scene and photographs of damaged articles;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 260 (1) (the point of assault) and Article 260 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Interference with the execution of official duties on the grounds of sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection and observation is a legitimate exercise of public authority.

arrow