logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2013.03.29 2012고합1386
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A person who has violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the Road Traffic Act (unclaimed Measures after Accidents) is engaged in driving cars of 31 ton and freight cars;

On November 7, 2012, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle on the 10:35th day of November, 2012, and continued to drive the above cargo vehicle on the side of the Cheongdo-do-do-do-do-ri-si.

The location is a road of one lane, and the center line of yellow solid lines is installed. In such a case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to thoroughly operate the front line and to safely operate the car line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the fault of running the central line to be tightly, and the part on the left side of the cargo vehicle of the victim D(32 years old) 1 ton of the victim D(32 years old) driving on the Cheongdo-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do.

As a result, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim D invertebrates, and suffered injury to the victim F (the 64 years of age) who took advantage of the victim F (the 64 years of age) from the cargo of the victim D, such as salt, tension, etc. of the bones of wood that requires three weeks medical treatment, and at the same time, escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim, even though it damages the 2,11,116 won of the damaged cargo vehicle, while immediately stopping the vehicle.

2. On November 11, 2012, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (e.g., refusal to measure the drinking level) was demanded to comply with the drinking test by inserting the fluor for about forty (40) minutes of the police box, on the grounds that there were reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol by driving the vehicle at the G police box at around 1:00, while voluntarily traveling the above place of the accident at around 11:00, and that the snow was fluored, and that he was under the influence of alcohol by driving the vehicle at around 40 (40) minutes of the police box belonging to the said police box.

arrow