The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) alleged to the effect that the Defendant was physically and mentally deprived or physically weak at the time of committing the instant crime on September 20, 2018 on the grounds of appeal by the Defendant, but the Defendant withdrawn the above assertion on the first trial date at the trial of the first instance, and is without merit ex officio.

The sentence of the lower court (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances are favorable to the fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflected, and that the victimized person does not want punishment against the Defendant by mutual agreement with the victim D.

However, in full view of the fact that the defendant was punished as the same crime, in particular, the defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for the crime of property damage, and was released on January 14, 2017 and was sentenced several times of a fine for the crime of property damage, assault, etc. during the period of repeated crime. Nevertheless, the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of it, and all other circumstances, including the defendant's age, sex, environment, background of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., which are the conditions of the punishment of this case as stated in the records, are considered to be appropriate, and thus, the defendant's argument about the sentencing of this case is not too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's argument about the punishment of this case is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.