logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2013.07.25 2013노459
업무방해등
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

Reasons

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

Punishments (fines 1,200,000) imposed on the defendant by the court below are too unreasonable.

We examine ex officio prior to the judgment on the grounds for appeal by the defendant.

In the case of insulting several persons by expressing abstract judgments or sacrific sentiments that may undermine social evaluation, several offenses of insult are established according to the number of victims. In the case where such sacrific expressions were made in the same opportunity at the same place, and where such sacrific expressions were deemed to have been made in the same opportunity at the same place, several offenses of insults are in a mutually competitive relationship.

이 사건 공소사실 중 각 모욕의 점은 피고인이 E 등이 듣고 있는 가운에 경찰관인 피해자 G, H에게 “야 십새끼야 니 좃들이나 까세요 내가 영등포 조폭인데 너희는 내가 다 죽여 버린다”라고 큰 소리로 말하여 피해자 G, H를 각 모욕하였다는 것인바, 앞서 본 법리에 비추어 보면 피해자 G, H를 모욕한 행위에 대하여는 각 모욕죄가 성립하고 그 모욕죄 상호간에는 상상적 경합의 관계에 있다고 할 것임에도, 원심은 이를 간과한 채 모욕죄 상호간에 실체적 경합의 관계에 있다고 보았으므로, 결국 원심판결에는 죄수판단에 관한 법리를 오해하여 판결에 영향을 미친 위법이 있다.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below can no longer be maintained.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below is reversed pursuant to Article 364 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act without examining the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing, and the judgment below is reversed and it is again decided as follows.

Criminal facts

The summary of the facts charged and the summary of the evidence recognized by the court are the same as the corresponding columns of the judgment of the court below, and thus, they are quoted in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

The application of legislation;

arrow