logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.05.15 2014나17328
보증채무금
Text

1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The Defendant’s KRW 2,648,392 and KRW 2,597,898 among the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s KRW 2,598 on June 21, 2013.

Reasons

1. The parties' assertion

A. On September 9, 2010, the Plaintiff, a financial institution specialized in credit, entered into a contract for lending KRW 13,200,000 to B between B and B, and the Defendant, as the father of B, has jointly and severally guaranteed the above loans to the Plaintiff, and the Defendant claimed against the Defendant to discharge the above joint and several liability obligations.

B. The defendant asserts that there is no such joint and several sureties.

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of arguments as to Gap evidence Nos. 3 through 9 and Eul's testimony, Eul entered into a contract with the plaintiff around September 9, 2010 to borrow 13,200,000 won with a loan period of 36 months from the plaintiff, interest rate of 1% per annum, interest rate of 24% per annum, and interest rate of arrears (hereinafter "the loan contract of this case"). The loan contract of this case was borrowed from the plaintiff while purchasing an automobile from Hyundai Automobile Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "Modern Automobile Co., Ltd.). The procedure for signing a joint and several sureties when selling an automobile is not done directly by a joint and several sureties. The procedure for checking documents such as personal seal impression issuance, resident registration certificate, and identification card copy, etc., which are brought by a joint and several sureties, shall be deemed to have been indicated on his/her own joint and several sureties's application form, and it shall be issued to the plaintiff, and it shall be confirmed that the plaintiff will will be finally confirmed in the contract and progress.

arrow