The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In misunderstanding the facts and legal principles, the Defendant was diced only once on the victim’s face in order to defend the attack of the victim under the influence of alcohol, and there was no fact that the victim was injured by scaming the victim, scaming with the hand floor with the hand floor, and making the victim use it on the floor by scambing it over the scam.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s unfair sentencing (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The lower court acknowledged the following facts based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court regarding the assertion of misunderstanding of facts and legal doctrine: (i) the Defendant, along with the investigator, found the victim’s ctv image taken by the investigative agency, and recognized the fact of assaulting the victim, such as: (i) the Defendant’s ctv image taken by the victim at the scene of the instant case one time with the launch of the victim’s bridge; (ii) one time with the right hand of the victim’s body; and (iii) cutting the victim’s body at the top of the victim’s body; and (iv) the fact that the victim’s face was knifeed by hand at the court of the lower court; and (iii) the Defendant cttv courseed by cutting the victim’s body to the front part of the victim’s bridge; and (iv) the Defendant was able to view the victim’s body back to the victim’s body in contact with the victim’s body; and (iv) the Defendant appears to have come beyond the victim’s body.