The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

C is a person who worked as a herb doctor without a herb doctor’s license under the name of F from “E Hanwon” in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D and 203, and the Defendant is a de facto operator of “E Hanwon”.

1. Notwithstanding the fact that the Defendant’s sole criminal act did not establish a medical institution, the Defendant, even though having been unable to engage in the medical business, did not report the establishment of a medical institution to the competent Gu office from December 5, 2015 to April 10, 2016, operated the medical business by opening one medical institution, one of which is a medical institution, without reporting the establishment of a medical institution to the competent Gu office.

2. On April 8, 2016, the Defendant and C’s joint criminal act C, around 15:00, visited G (at the age of 57) with a bed with a bed with a bed with a view to a bed at Hanwon (at the age of 57), without a herb doctor’s license, committed a non-licensed medical act in the way of sticking 10 to 3 parts of the head 6cm in length, 2 to 3 parts on the part of the hand, such as hand hand, etc., and 0.5cm in 0 to 0.5cm in length. The Defendant, at the above date, at the above place, C, who is an employee, committed an act in violation of the Defendant’s duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of each police officer against C or I;

1. Each police statement made to H and G;

1. A statement of medical expenses;

1. A copy of the medical records;

1. Copies of each sales account book;

1. External photographs of Do council members;

1. Investigation report (report on establishment of a medical institution, certificate of oriental medical doctor and attachment of license);

1. He argues that the defendant is not a person who actually operates the above Council members even if the inside part of the Council members is met (the defendant and his defense counsel);

In light of the records of this case, it is recognized that the sub-lease contract was submitted between the defendant and I to the effect that the defendant will deliver the above member to I on April 5, 2016, but on the other hand, it was established under the name of the above member and the consent of the above member on April 11, 2016, which is the date and time of crime.