A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of 21 years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 4, 2018, around 23:40 on June 4, 2018, the Defendant was in front of the store C in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and “The father was under the influence of alcohol.”

The telephone communications should no longer be made.

The police officer interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported cases by the police officer due to assault, such as discovering the defendant, taking a bath to E without any reason, and selling a part of E one time for drinking alcohol, by assaulting him/her at the location of the Incheon Southern Police Station D District of the Police Station, who was called the police officer's 112 report and dispatched him/her to the station of the State.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement of F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 62(1) of the Suspension of Execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2007Da1448, Apr. 1, 2007) (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2007Da14484, Apr. 2, 2007) are contrary to the grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e., Supreme Court Decision