1. The Defendant shall comply with the procedures for reporting the closure of the business license stated in the separate sheet to the Plaintiff.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, and 9 (including branch numbers), the purport of the entire pleadings is as follows: on December 15, 2009, the plaintiff, on December 15, 2009, leased 62.59 square meters of security deposit of 5 million won, monthly rent of 500,000 won, monthly rent of 500,000 won, and the lease period of 24 months (hereinafter referred to as "the above lease contract" in this case; the above part of the building is referred to as "the building of this case"); the defendant, from October 15, 2011 to June 26, 2007, it is evident that the plaintiff filed a report on the termination of the lease contract of this case with the Mayor on June 26, 2007.

According to the above facts, the lease contract of this case terminated due to the termination of the lease term or the termination of the lease contract under the delivery of the duplicate of the complaint of this case, and the lessee’s duty to restore due to the termination of the lease includes not only transferring the possession of the real estate used by the lessee to the lessor, but also the lessor’s duty to cooperate for the lessor to use it again in line with the purpose of the real estate at the time of the lease (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2008Da34903, Oct. 9, 2008). Thus, the Defendant, the lessee, is deemed to have the duty to report the closure of the lease contract as to the portion of the leased building so that the Plaintiff or the third party

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to file a report on business closure as stated in the separate sheet with the plaintiff. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified.