1. Defendant A’s 69,883,721 won and the Plaintiff’s 5% per annum from July 25, 2017 to June 14, 2019.

1. Chief;

A. The plaintiff's assertion

1. The plaintiff is a special corporation established by the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act") and entrusted by the Minister of Employment and Labor with the industrial accident compensation insurance business, and the non-party A City Environmental Office (hereinafter referred to as "non-party A") is in the relationship between the insurer and the insured under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, and the non-party D (hereinafter referred to as "victim") paid insurance benefits under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act for the occupational accident of the non-party D (hereinafter referred to as "victim") to which the respondent acquired the right to claim damages against the defendants under Article 87 of the Industrial Accident Compensation

Defendant A is a person who operates and supervises the instant Aise Environment Business Office, and the Defendant

2. Section B is a person who manages the instant accident facility as the director of the Asi Environmental Office, and Defendant C is a public official belonging to Section A, who is liable for damages for an accident caused by the victim, as described in paragraph 2 below, and the recourse obligor who is obliged to comply with the Plaintiff’s claim.

2. Occurrence of the right of indemnity;

A. On February 2, 2016, the person subject to the accident was an employee of the non-party business office, who was not in operation of a recycling compressed machine (hereinafter “compactors”) at the recycling line at the non-party business office in the non-party business office on February 13:34, 2016, and Defendant C reworking the compressed machine without permission without confirming the location of the victim or the end of cleaning and cutting down the hands on the right hand in the compressed machine.

(hereinafter referred to as "the accident in this case"). The accident in this case was diagnosed as "the complete cutting of the upper part of the upper part of the water, the upper part of the upper part of the water, the upper part of the upper part of the water, the upper part of the upper part of the water, and the upper part of the right part of the water."

B. In relation to the instant accident, Defendant C, the perpetrator, has finished cleaning while operating compressors.