1. The defendant's compulsory execution against the plaintiff is enforced according to the Seoul Eastern District Court Decision 2005Da22968 Decided April 12, 2006.

1. We examine the judgment on the cause of the claim, and there is no dispute between the parties, and the defendant filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff et al. (Seoul Eastern District Court 2005Gaso229668). The above lawsuit was initiated by public notice against the plaintiff. On April 24, 2006, the above court sentenced the plaintiff et al. to pay 15 million won to the defendant and the amount calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from March 21, 2006 to the day of full payment (hereinafter "the related judgment of this case"). The related judgment of this case becomes final and conclusive on May 10, 206, and the plaintiff is not liable to grant immunity to the creditor of this case except for the case of 2007Da76499, 2007Ha decided on April 18, 2008, and the plaintiff is not liable to grant immunity to the creditor of this case. The decision of this case is confirmed by the court below's decision of exemption from bankruptcy.

2. The defendant's defense asserted that the plaintiff did not be exempted from liability because he did not enter claims based on the relevant judgment in the above list of creditors in bad faith. However, the evidence submitted by the defendant alone is insufficient to recognize the fact that the plaintiff omitted claims based on the relevant judgment in bad faith. Thus, the defendant's defense is rejected.

3. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and this decision is delivered with the assent of all participating Justices.