The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The Defendant’s argument in the grounds of appeal is that, as indicated in the facts charged in the instant case, the Defendant did not inflict injury upon the victim E due to beer disease, and that, in collusion with B, the lower court did not err in finding erroneous facts and found the Defendant guilty by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the establishment of each crime, which is unlawful.

However, the recognition of facts and the selection and evaluation of evidence, which are the premise thereof, belong to the exclusive authority of the fact-finding court unless it exceeds the limit of the free evaluation of evidence

The judgment below

In light of the records, the court below cannot find out the grounds that the court below exceeded the limit of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, and there is no illegality in the misapprehension of legal principles as to the establishment of each of the above crimes.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.