The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for four months) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The following facts are favorable: (a) the Defendant acknowledges and reflects the instant crime; (b) the fact that the lower judgment’s prior conviction and the latter concurrent crimes under the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act should be considered at the same time in relation to the judgment.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case without being tried due to the crime recorded in the records of the judgment below, that the defendant committed the crime of this case, that the defendant was subject to juvenile protective disposition due to the fact that he committed an accident while driving without a license while driving a crime without a license, and that he also received juvenile protective disposition due to driving without a license, and that the defendant did not recover from damage to the trial, and that he did not agree with the victim.

There is no special relationship or change of circumstances that can be newly considered in the trial of the political party, and in full view of various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is not accepted.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit and thus dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.