The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because the sentence of a fine of KRW 1.5 million imposed by the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and against his mistake, the Defendant’s economic situation is not sufficient, the victims have been compensated for personal and material damage through the taxi mutual aid association, and the Defendant has been driving a taxi in order to collect taxi commission on behalf of friendly children.

However, the crime of this case is committed on the part of the defendant while driving a taxi, resulting in injury to the driver and five passengers of the other vehicle due to occupational negligence in violation of the signal, in light of the degree of such injury, the number of victims, etc., and the degree of damage of the vehicle, the degree of the shock is not less than that of the accident of personnel, and the degree of damage of the vehicle could lead to a more serious personnel accident. The victim I and the other victims, who was a passenger of the vehicle of the defendant driving, did not reach an agreement separate from the victim I and the J, which were the passengers of the vehicle of the defendant driving, and the lower court seems to have determined the sentence against the defendant in consideration of various circumstances, and taking into account all other circumstances, the lower court’s punishment is not unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.